Search for: "McDonald v. McDonald" Results 181 - 200 of 2,528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2008, 8:45 pm
”The parties’ testimony periods close in September.The case cite is McDonald’s Corp. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 5:03 pm
We all remember the classic case of Liebeck v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:28 am by Nick Hilborne, Litigation Futures
” The Supreme Court heard in McDonald v The National Grid Electricity Transmission plc [2014] UKSC 53, that Percy McDonald died of mesothelioma at the beginning of this year. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:54 am by sally
Regina (McDonald) v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2011] UKSC 33; [2011] WLR (D) 218 “A local authority had been entitled to withdraw the funding for a night-time carer to assist a disabled person to use a commode when required, and to instead provide her with incontinence pads to wear at night. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:30 pm by brian
SCOTUSblog - Analysis: state gun regulations and McDonald - The practical effect of incorporation [Matthew Scarola| Monday, June 28th, 2010] "Today’s opinion in McDonald v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 9:21 am by Nassiri Law
In Betts .v McDonald’s Corp., a large restaurant chain was named as a defendant by 10 Hispanic and African American men who allege their termination by a franchisee of three Virginia-based restaurants amounts to racial discrimination. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 8:55 am
Given that McDonald's took no steps to accommodate the complainant, and indeed did not even meet with her until the decision to terminate her employment had been made, the Tribunal awarded $25,000 for loss of dignity and self-respect.See: Beena Datt v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:46 am by Harold O'Grady
McDonald's Restaurants, P.T.S., Inc. and McDonald's International, Inc. as a synonym for court abuse. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 11:09 am
McDonald’s (”Billions and Billions Served”) has suffered a reversal in the landmark case of McDonald’s v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:56 pm
IJ does not ask the Court in McDonald v. [read post]