Search for: "McDonald v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 857
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2020, 2:13 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Finally, the United States Supreme Court ruling on the Wayfair case opened new pathways for states to legally tax remote sales. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
I assume the same would hold true for the court’s ruling in McDonald v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Decisions about voter list maintenance, one of the most essential bureaucratic duties of state election officials, received intense scrutiny in several states this year. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
Since the mid-1970s, he has been deeply pessimistic about the possibilities of political change: Political action of any sort, he believes, cannot improve or ameliorate the condition of black people in the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
 Buckley and Citizens United were well covered; a few added McConnell v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 After losing before the New Jersey Supreme Court, Princeton appealed to the United States Supreme Court with an absurd argument that their institutional First Amendment rights were violated by requiring that it allow people like my client on campus. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The plaintiffs emphasize the long history of Virginia mandating disclosure of race as a means of enforcing the state’s anti-miscegenation laws prior to the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Twitter’s policy states that users “may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people” and the social network prohibits “the glorification of violence. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
Between the years 1973 and 2011, one hundred of nearly 2,000 Salmonella outbreaks in the United States were traced back to beef, leading to 3,684 illnesses.[1] Salmonella is omnipresent in feedlot cattle. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, affirmed the district court's ruling.Addressing the Retirees' "Contracts Clause" claim, the court said that the Retirees argue that the City’s 2010 Ordinance violates the Constitution's Contracts Clause because "their collective bargaining agreement [CBA] guaranteed that the City would pay the full cost of their health insurance premiums. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:45 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
 2019), the judgment of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, United States v. [read post]