Search for: "McKinney v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm
MoreIn favor of the Condemned Timothy Terell McKinney v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:40 am
However, it is clear from section 8 of the act amending Insurance Law § 3420 that the amendments were to "apply to policies issued or delivered in this state on or after [January 17, 2009]" (McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 27, Insurance Law § 3420, 2009 Pocket Part, at 15, Historical and Statutory Notes, L 2008, ch 388, § 8; see generally Matter of Auerbach v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 86 NY2d 198, 204). [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 3:01 pm
McKINNEY, Appellant, v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:45 am
Mar. 27, 2006) (dismissing a Section 349 claim arising out of an attorney-client relationship for failure to state a consumer protection claim) (citing, inter alia, Exxonmobil Inter-America, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 8:12 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:28 am
CARY PRESS,;No 06-CV-6686 (JFB) (ARL);UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 7:35 am
Co. v State Farm Mut. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 9:45 am
In Greenlee v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 11:18 am
See McKinney v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm
” Coker v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 1:09 am
BRONX COUNTYCivil PracticeCourt Finds Legislature's Delegation of Power To Commission on Healthcare Is Proper McKinney v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:55 am
CPLR §§ 7803(3)-(4) (McKinney 2014). [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:55 am
CPLR §§ 7803(3)-(4) (McKinney 2014). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:56 am
In Monasky v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 3:49 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 8:12 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:34 am
* §§17 and 18 of the Public Officers Law address providing State officers and employees and officers and employees of political subdivisions of the State with legal representation and reimbursement for legal fees and expenses incurred in defense of a civil action arising out an act or omission involving the performance of official duties. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:25 am
The Appellate Division explained that "It is the duty of the courts to so construe two statutes that they will be in harmony, if that can be done without violating the established canons of statutory interpretation," (see McKinney's Consolidated Laws of New York, Book 1, Statutes §398). [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:03 am
” In a Federalist Society teleforum (audio), Arizona Solicitor General Oramel Skinner discusses the decision Tuesday in McKinney v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
