Search for: "Mechanical Contractors v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 613
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2019, 8:50 am
Following the Illinois Supreme Court’s decision in Rosenbach v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 7:13 am
(“NGS”) v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 12:50 pm
To avoid what would likely have been (and may still be) yet another suit, the settlement also created a mechanism to evaluate the independent contractor or employment status of each dancer. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 12:03 pm
In Hyde Park Free Will Baptist Church v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Rohrmoos Venture v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
Multiple engineers and contractors were called in, but the issue persisted into 2009 and then began to worsen as the building apparently suffered significant water penetration. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 7:56 am
Related Musings:Your Contractual Notice/Claim Procedures MatterThe Anatomy of a Construction Dispute Stage 2-…What Can You Do with a Mechanic’s Lien Mid Project? [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 4:02 pm
District Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Fazaga v FBI, which flatly rejected the application of the state secret privilege in electronic surveillance cases. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:53 am
The case of White v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:53 am
The case of White v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 10:38 am
Section 241(6) essentially states that property owners and general contractors owe a duty of care to construction workers to abide by the Industrial Code. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 11:12 am
Citing Lohmann Golf Designs, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 10:47 am
Chris Hoofnagle, they chose opt-out to avoid the IMS v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 10:55 am
After INS v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:03 pm
Where Insurance and Contracts Collide in ConstructionConsiderations in Obtaining a Mechanic’s Lien in…Just When You Thought General Contractors Were…Update and Changes to DC Mechanic’s Lien Statute [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:12 am
Grp., LLC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:32 pm
Although the classification status of Uber and Lyft drivers has been hotly litigated in state and federal courts for nearly a decade, given this recent decision, it seems unlikely that a finding of employment status of these drivers under another statute (using, for example, California’s independent contractor test under Dynamex v. [read post]
