Search for: "Medina v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 229
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2009, 12:01 am
iStock_000000701427Medium.jpg Sixth Circuit reverses conviction based on trial court's failure to clearly demark between the agents' expert and lay testimony and failure to give a cautionary instruction about the dual roles of agent's testimony, which was plain error, in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 5:03 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 7:03 am
SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Details emerge of secret ACTA negotiation: privacy, P2P major targets (KEI) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Techdirt) (Ars Technica) New Zealand three strikes law comes into effect after 28 February (Ars Technica) (ZDNet) (Techdirt) Global Global - General Job security and data security (ZDNet) Global - Copyright… [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 10:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
" The two dissenting judges (Erdmann & Ryan, JJ.) argued that the majority's approach was precluded by United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 9:34 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 3:56 pm
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 12:13 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 11:40 pm
Hoege III, Flying Without a Net: United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 10:42 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to… [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 3:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 8:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
(Justice Willett not sitting)State of Texas v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 6:36 pm
The United States is a signatory to this treaty. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:18 pm
AND STEVE ZEMKOSKI; from Roberts County; 7th district (07-05-00327-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 06-14-07) [separate opinion in 07-05-0327-CV] 2 petitions07-0986 MARELYN MEDINA, M.D. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
Medina, and M. [read post]
