Search for: "Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts" Results 181 - 200 of 384
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2010, 4:08 pm by Matt Cameron
I’ll have more to say about this shortly, but here are a few immediate thoughts: Padilla is kind of an interesting counterpoint to last year’s monumental Sixth Amendment ruling in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:44 am by James Bickford
The Boston Globe reported on the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s retroactive application of Melendez-Diaz to drug trials held from 2005 to 2009. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:56 pm by Dwight Sullivan
I highly recommend Major Daniel Froehlich’s article, The Impact of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 11:33 am
These members probably correctly assumed a per curiam reversal would be issued in light of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 11:33 am by Nicole Mazzocco
The court issued this opinion following a remand from the Michigan Supreme Court directing the court to reconsider its original opinion in light of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:14 pm
Melendez-Diaz, which now prevents the prosecutor from proving its case by way of ex-parte court affidavits and without the proponent being subject to cross-examination. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
  As to the GSR test report, the court notes that Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:37 am
The reversal of the defendants gun convictions follows the recent ruling in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 3:34 pm by Steve Kalar
The Supreme Court granted, vacated, and remanded the Ninth’s opinion in light of its decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
Sure, the requirements of the unavailability of the witness in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 6:53 am by Adam Chandler
UniversalHUB reports that the petitioner in last Term’s Confrontation Clause case, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
 Interestingly, Justice Scalia references Shellow, as follows, in his majority opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]