Search for: "Merrick v. Merrick"
Results 181 - 200
of 676
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
El caso de Estados Unidos v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
In a case pending at the Supreme Court, Fulton v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:28 am
Yesterday’s violent storming of the Capitol building raises questions about President Trump’s fitness to see out the remaining two weeks of his term; about whether large parts of the Republican Party remain committed to even basic norms of democratic government; and about how the country should move on from this brazen attack on the peaceful transition of power. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
Totten v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm
In lieu of our regular Friday feature—the Week in Review—The Regulatory Review is recapping some of the top regulatory news from the past year, including the coronavirus pandemic, the 2020 presidential election, and more. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am
On 11 December 2020, the UK Supreme Court handed down judgment in Mastercard v Merricks, dismissing Mastercard’s appeal. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:45 am
The respondent’s, Mr Merrick’s, claim arises out of the European Commission’s decision in December 2007 that the appellants breached competition law by fixing a default ‘interchange fee’ as part of their payment card schemes between May 1992 and December 2007 (the “Commission Decision”). [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 ABC (AP) v Principal Reporter & Anor (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019… [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The first is Mastercard Incorporated and Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm
He promoted abolitionist causes until his death, 52 years before the court cemented slavery’s place in our antebellum Constitution in Dred Scott v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard 13 and 14 May 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 ABC (AP) v Principal Reporter &… [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard 13 and 14 May 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda… [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard 13 and 14 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an… [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 12:28 pm
There are many areas of the law, from bankruptcy to patents to criminal justice, where they can show they are not engaged in the Red Team v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
When Justice Antonin Scalia died in February 2016, they piously announced that the American People should have a voice in selecting his successor, denying a hearing to Barack Obama’s nominee, the center-left Judge Merrick Garland. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:25 am
All this was literally true, in the sense that if Bork had been on the Court and had commanded a majority, major Supreme Court decisions such as Roe v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 4:54 am
During his questioning of Judge Amy Coney Barrett, former Connecticut attorney general, now senator, Richard Blumenthal, claimed that Barrett “admitted” her dissent in a Seventh Circuit Second Amendment case, Kanter v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Los ataques, a palabras de Bagué Soto, se estarán centrando en la postura de la jueza sobre el Affordable Care Act, mejor conocido como Obamacare, y sobre Roe v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 7:25 am
Carr, and Reynolds v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:59 am
In Duren v. [read post]
