Search for: "Michaels v. Superior Court" Results 181 - 200 of 1,052
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v] Two examples of these strategic practices emerged following the Delaware Court of Chancery’s decision in the Trulia case[vi] and the Supreme Court’s decision in the Cyan case. [read post]
28 May 2020, 1:18 pm by Preston Lim
On May 27, Associate Chief Justice Heather Holmes of the Supreme Court of British Columbia—the province’s superior trial court—released her ruling in the case of United States v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released an important decision in the case with significant implications for creators involving copyright, fair dealing, moral rights, and a host of other legal issues. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
In Ontario, the Superior Court of Justice has issued a notice stating that the Court “remains committed to the open court principle throughout the COVID-19 pandemic” and has detailed a procedure for the public and media to access remote proceedings. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 7:45 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
These problems haven’t been ignored in Canada, and in 2010 I wrote a joint piece at The Court with a fellow law student, where we discussed Piedra v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am by Hannah Kris, William Ford
Michael McDevitt, a senior fellow at CNA. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:43 pm by Hannah Kris
.: The American Enterprise Institute will be hosting an event for the release of Michael Rubin and Brian Kaulis’ new edited volume, “Seven Pillars: What Really Causes Instability in the Middle East? [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:16 am by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
The committee will hear testimony from Inspector General Michael Horowitz. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
” The “objective partisan assumption” is that lawyers can make independent ethical evaluations of client behaviour, while also remaining loyal to clients partisan Cognitive biases toward optimism, confirmation of existing beliefs make it much more difficult for lawyers to neutrally assess the behaviour of their own clients The perjury trilemma: lawyers have duties to (1) be competent, (2) preserve client confidences, and (3) be honest in court. [read post]