Search for: "Miller v. Department of Corrections" Results 181 - 200 of 327
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
Diaz, No. 08-1575 A sentence pursuant to a guilty plea to knowingly possessing methamphetamine with intent to distribute is affirmed where, because the decision to depart by levels is discretionary, the district court's decision to select the higher of two levels that encompassed the mandatory minimum sentence was procedural error.. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland), heard 12 Jun 2017. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland), heard 12 Jun 2017. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Miller v Associated Newspapers, 10 and 11 December 2013 (Maurice Kay, Moore-Bick and Lloyd-Jones LJJ) Mount v Hodder & Staughton Limited, 16 January 2014 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE § 357 at 604 (1969)).Our standard of review in PRA cases is also de novo. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
Davis asks the now-familiar question whether Miller v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 7:28 am
Box 235850 Honolulu, HI 96853-3514 Phone: (808) 528-4742 UCP UCP of Hawaii 414 Kuwili Street, Suite 105 Honolulu, HI 96817-5050 Phone: (808) 532-6744 Fax: (808) 532-6747 E-mail: ucpa@diverseabilities.org Web: http://www.ucpahi.org Visual Impairments American Foundation for the Blind-West 111 Pine Street, Suite 725 San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone: (415) 392-4845 E-mail: sanfran@afb.org Web: http://www.afb.org Hawaii Association of the Blind Web: http://www.acb.org/hawaii EARLY INTERVENTION … [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 7:55 pm by Jamie Markham
§ 921.1402(d)(3) (Department of Corrections must give 18-month notice to juvenile offenders entitled to judicial review of sentence). [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm by Thomas Kaufman
  (4) The Cal Supremes cited with approval a number of cases that held that employees fell within the administrative exemption, including Miller and the following other federal cases: Smith v. [read post]