Search for: "Miller v. State of California" Results 181 - 200 of 1,364
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2010, 6:57 am by Jeff Gamso
United States, 470 U.S. 598, 607–08 (1985) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see also United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm by Arthur F. Coon
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  But the proponents’ claim that the California Supreme Court can and should address this alleged lawlessness by state officials is open to some serious complexity and significant doubt. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:44 am by Arthur F. Coon and Matthew C. Henderson
  For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:07 pm by Arthur F. Coon
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 5:06 am
California, 453 U.S. 420, 427 (1981), overruled on other grounds by United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 3:44 pm
  And a judge on the Ninth Circuit, predictably, requested a vote to take the case en banc.Now, in a normal case, the state (here, California) would also file a petition to take the case en banc. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Background In March 2018, the United States Supreme Court held in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:04 am
California State Teachers Retirement System (06-560). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:25 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Perry, the case (argued late last month) in which two same-sex couples sued in federal court to invalidate California’s Proposition 8, a voter-adopted state constitutional ban on gay marriage. [read post]