Search for: "Miller v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 2,666
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2022, 1:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Background In March 2018, the United States Supreme Court held in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 3:08 pm by Geoff Schweller
In a new amicus brief filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:09 am by Emma Snell
Treasury Department’s anti-money laundering unit ha [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am by Orin S. Kerr
United States holds that Miranda is a constitutional rule, not some sort of supervisory decision; and 42 U.S.C. 1983 provides that a person who "causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 11:48 am by Daniel Miller
Following the Supreme Court of the United States ruling in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 5:01 am by Etta Lanum
By 1981, the Supreme Court was reviewing a sex discrimination case titled Rostker v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:49 am by Roger Parloff
Defendant Miller, of Dallas County, Texas, still faces 11 other charges, including five felonies, so it’s unclear whether the department will appeal Nichols’s ruling. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 2:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
Adams relating to the flag on his property that says, 'Fuck Biden and fuck you for voting for him.'" The Agreed Entry further states: Consistent with the United States Supreme Court decision in Cohen v. [read post]