Search for: "Mitchell v. Land" Results 181 - 200 of 234
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
For the purposes of this Treaty an aircraft shall be considered in flight from the moment when power is applied for the purpose of the take-off until the moment when the landing run ends [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:26 pm by Aaron
Redlightning’s conviction for killing Rita Disanjh on Native American land with premeditation and in the perpetration or attempted perpetration of sexual abuse. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm by Lawrence Solum
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:22 pm by Jon Sands
The Waste Land (1922)(V. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:31 am by David Smith
Seaport Investments Limited, Seymore Henry Sweeney Carol Sweeney v Andrew Cameron, Mitchell Bailey, John Crooks and the Attorney-General [1999] NIQB 1943 This case concerns rights of way across a property near the Giant's Causeway known as Runkerry House. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:31 am by David Smith
Seaport Investments Limited, Seymore Henry Sweeney Carol Sweeney v Andrew Cameron, Mitchell Bailey, John Crooks and the Attorney-General [1999] NIQB 1943 This case concerns rights of way across a property near the Giant's Causeway known as Runkerry House. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Steven Taber
The Barnstable Municipal Airport Commission is planning to cover the cost through expected state funds, airport reserve money, a town-backed general obligation bond, and stimulus funds, and even has surplus land that it could sell if necessary. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am by Dave
In Henry and Mitchell v Henry [2010] UKPC 3, the Privy Council have given further consideration to the doctrine of proprietary estoppel. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am by Dave
In Henry and Mitchell v Henry [2010] UKPC 3, the Privy Council have given further consideration to the doctrine of proprietary estoppel. [read post]