Search for: "Mitchell v. State of Washington" Results 181 - 200 of 246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
(The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office practice regarding legal expenses in oppositions (The IP Factor)   New Zealand New Zealand launches second ACTA consultation (Michael Geist)   United Kingdom EWHC request for summary judgment denied - OHIM-IPO class heading conflict case: Daimler v Sany (IPKat)   United States US General Trade secret litigation on the rise against laid off employees (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) Seeking and justifying attorney… [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am by Walter Shaub
Meadows to the State of Georgia’s Response to his Notice of Removal at 1, State of Georgia v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Washington Post discusses the matter here. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The biggest legal story of this coming week will be the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – the Article 50 “Brexit” judgment. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
However, denial of one petition is reversed where the state court's lack of notification and petitioner's prompt filing after receiving a response to his inquiry to the state court justified tolling. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:58 am by Emma Snell
Tom Mitchell and Demetri Sevastopulo report for the Financial Times. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
After nearly two weeks, the plaintiff was transferred back to Avery-Mitchell. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 7:45 am
The North Carolina Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains resources for those with cerebral palsy within the State of North Carolina. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:37 am by David Kravets
Eric Schwartz, an intellectual property attorney with Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp in Washington, D.C., said the case boils down to whether Congress has the power under the Copyright Act to do what it did, and whether it was consistent with the First Amendment rights of the plaintiffs. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 4:29 am by Emma Snell
Ellen Mitchell reports for The Hill. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by fjhinojosa
Beyer’s article Estate Planning Ramifications of Obergefell v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:25 am by Emma Snell
Mitchell McCluskey reports for CNN. [read post]