Search for: "Mobile Productivity, LLC"
Results 181 - 200
of 876
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2010, 10:03 am
By Jason RantanenWiAV Solutions LLC v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 11:50 am
Otter Products, LLC, 1:11-cv-02260 (N.D. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 2:45 pm
Emcod, LLC, Docket No. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:08 am
Fashion Electronics, Inc., Opposition No. 91247034 [Opposition to registration of EVOGUE for battery chargers, cell phone cases, headphones, carrying cases, handheld digital music players, protective covers for mobile phones, laptops, and portable media players, and wireless speakers, on the grounds of likelihood of confusion with and likely dilution of the registered mark VOGUE for, inter alia, magazines and mobile phone software.] [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 9:23 am
AT&T Mobility LLC, 64 F.4th 1311, 1317 (Fed. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:51 pm
Bdh., PNY Technologies, Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Beijing SE Putian Mobile Communications Co., Ltd., Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd., Verbatim Americas LLC, and Verbatim Corporation (collectively, the “K&E Respondents”) filed a motion seeking leave to amend their notice of prior art, by adding U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 5:30 pm
Baker of Wilson Elser on the firm’s blog, Product Liability Advocate California Gender Pay Equality Bill To Be Strictest In Nation? [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 11:44 am
M-Edge Accessories LLC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:02 am
January 11, 2017 -11 AM: In re Shabby Chic Brands LLC, Serial No. 85135970 [Section 2(b) refusal of the mark shown below left, for various goods in class 20, 21, and 24, including furniture, dinnerware, and fabrics, on the ground that the mark includes a simulation or design that resembles a governmental insignia of the United Kingdom’s Prince of Wales emblem (shown below right)]. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 3:25 pm
According to an exclusive report by the Times of India, the CCI investigation found Google guilty of stifling competition in mobile operating systems. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 3:12 am
Cascades Computer Innovation, LLC v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 3:28 am
GFA Brands, Inc., Opposition No. 91194974 [Opposition to registration of SMART BALANCE for frozen entrees and for various snack foods and desserts, on the grounds of likelihood of confusion with, and likelihood of dilution of, the registered mark SMART ONES for various types of frozen foods, including entrees, desserts, ready-to-eat wraps, pizzas, and breakfast foods].April 30, 2014 - 10 AM: In re LAMB-GRS LLC, Serial No. 77756492 [Section 2(a) refusal to register the mark L.A.M.B. for… [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 2:29 am
June 24, 2020 - 1 PM: In re Timber Pizza Company, LLC, Serial Nos. 87215848 and 87215852 [Section 2(d) refusals of TIMBER PIZZA CO. and TIMBER PIZZA CO. and Design for"restaurant and bar services; Providing of food and drink via a mobile truck" [PIZZA CO. disclaimed] in view of the registered marks TIMBERS in standard characters for “restaurant services” and U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 10:54 am
Cingular Wireless LLC, -- F. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:38 am
Knispel, LLC. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 4:20 am
Motorola Mobility LLC, the court denied a motion to enhance damages for willfulness because, among other factors, “the accused products were alleged to infringe because of chips made by Qualcomm, which are used industry-wide, rather than technology created by Motorola. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 11:23 am
Mike is co-founder and CEO of HomePath Products LLC. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:30 pm
" The case cite is Kinbook, LLC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:41 am
January 8, 2019 - 2 PM: Oakwon Demographics LLC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 10:44 am
Google LLC (case no. 1:20-cv-03010, District of Columbia): Defendant Google LLC's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Its Motion Motion for Summary JudgmentGoogle describes the states' allegations as follows:(1) designing certain units appearing on its search engine results page in a way that allegedly discriminates against companies that Plaintiffs call “Specialized Vertical Providers” (“SVPs”), as well as entering into certain data… [read post]
