Search for: "Moore v. Goode" Results 181 - 200 of 1,111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In Moore, the Court opened the door to good faith as a defense by positively referencing a good faith instruction given by the district court.[3] Since then, however, the Court has remained silent regarding the availability and scope of the defense. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 12:35 pm
  That, of course, is why this was such a good decision.Congratulations to Doug Moore, Meera Sossamon and Kevin Urquhart at Irwin Fritchie Urquhart & Moore for a great victory. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 9:11 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Last Friday, the Federal Circuit heard en banc argument on whether it should adopt a U.S. rule of international patent exhaustion in Lexmark v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:10 am by SHG
" As we know only too well from Connick v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court didn’t address and debunk ISL on the merits (as it later did last summer in Moore v Harper), the Court dismissed Texas’s filing on the ground that Texas lacked standing under Article III because “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:51 am by SHG
” Under the principle of the venerable case of Martin v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 7:32 am by Rick Hasen
With news that the North Carolina Supreme Court has flipped to Republican control, there is a good chance that the this court’s holding that partisan gerrymandering violates the state constitution will be overturned. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 12:30 pm
In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Prouds Jewellers Pty Ltd  [2008] FCA 75 the Federal Court held that 'Was/Now' discount advertising by Prouds Jewellers Pty Ltd was misleading in breach of the Trade Practices Act 1974. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:12 pm
  This time, the inspiration is a curious little opinion by the Second Circuit in Moore v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 8:17 am by Sasha Volokh
I came across the following discussion of the case method in an Alabama Supreme Court opinion, Moore v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:04 am
In Zurich Insurance Company PLC v Hayward [2011] EWCA Civ 641 the Court of Appeal held that Zurich was entitled to bring new evidence of fraudulent behaviour by an individual who was injured at work despite the fact that issues as to his good faith had already been raised in a prior action.In 1998 Hayward was injured in the course of his employment with a company called David S Smith Packaging Company (Smith), which had taken out employers' liability insurance with Zurich. [read post]