Search for: "Morales v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 7,344
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2023, 6:38 am by Scott Bomboy
“A law branding one class of persons as criminal solely based on the State’s moral disapproval of that class and the conduct associated with that class runs contrary to the values of the Constitution and the Equal Protection Clause,” she wrote. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:09 am by Alden Abbott
Identifying and eliminating these outside hires is the first step to cleaning up the agency and improving employee morale. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:39 am
" Excerpt:The "free lunch" refers to the once-common tradition of saloons in the United States providing a "free" lunch to patrons who had purchased at least one drink. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm by Gareth Davies
Nevertheless, while hardly a moral high point in the history of the Court, WABE did emphasise that it was not enough to just want a neutrality policy. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:38 pm by Marci Hamilton
  She reasoned that banning males from a state nursing school was based on tired stereotypes, which set the stage for the later decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:04 am by Frank Cranmer
In Ţîmpău v Romania [2023] ECHR 982, the applicant, Doina Ţîmpău, challenged her dismissal as a lay teacher of Orthodox religion in a public school. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
” Health care providers described feeling moral distress when they were unable to provide evidence- based care, and some reported considering moving their practices to a state where abortion remains legal…” [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 4:12 am by jonathanturley
I previously wrote about the latest New York gun law passed after the Court’s ruling in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am by CMS
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
In a judgement of 26 July 2022, Nicklin J held that the defamatory meaning was that the Claimant was a hypocrite who had screwed the country and set a poor moral example to young people ([2022] EWHC 2469 (QB)). [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm by Legal Aggregate
But, at least for now, she was also a last: the last Justice to have held elective public office (as a state senator, and first female majority leader of a state senate). [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:16 pm by Michael Oykhman
However, common law, such as R v Ruzic and R v Ryan notes that the list of excluded offences under section 17 is unconstitutional as that risks convicting morally innocent individuals. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 10:14 am by Robin Happel
Although the legal history of boycotts in America is complex, boycotts have widely been considered protected speech since NAACP v. [read post]