Search for: "Motorola, Inc. "
Results 181 - 200
of 676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2012, 11:12 am
Motorola, Inc., et. al., 1-11-cv-08540 (ILND June 22, 2012, Order) (Posner, C.J.). [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:04 pm
The complaint alleges that Motorola, Inc. of Schaumburg, Illinois and Motorola Mobility, Inc. of Libertyville, Illinois (“Motorola Mobility”) (collectively, “Motorola”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and sell within the U.S. after importation certain mobile devices and related software that infringe U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:08 am
Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., No. 06-43 (U.S.).The case involved an action brought by shareholders of Charter Communications, Inc. against two of Charter's suppliers, Motorola, Inc. and Scientific-Atlanta,Inc., under Section 10(b) of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b-5. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 11:50 am
FTC Says Injunctions Related to Standard-Essential Patents Can Harm Competition, InnovationThe brief addresses this issue in the context of patent infringement claims that Motorola, Inc. has filed against Apple, Inc. regarding technologies used in iPhones and iPads that allegedly are covered by Motorola’s SEPs. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:33 pm
Here's Google's notice of appeal (click on the image to enlarge or read the text below the image):NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Motorola, Inc., Motorola Mobility, Inc. and General Instrument Corporation (collectively, "Motorola"), Defendants and Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants in the above-captioned case, appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit from the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) Judgment of the District Court… [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
The lawsuit "marks a major escalation of patent litigation that has already swept up the smartphone and tablet sectors and high-tech stalwarts such as Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp and Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:22 am
Skyhook Wireless Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 3:25 pm
Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 5:05 am
The action and investigation initiated by the ITC include Motorola Mobility, Inc. and HTC Corporation (HTC), whose products incorporate the alleged infringing RF ICs. [read post]
Federal Circuit denies Google motion to terminate Apple's appeal of Wisconsin rate-setting dismissal
3 May 2013, 9:23 am
Nike, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:20 am
In relation to EAS, Microsoft in any case had a licence, because Microsoft’s licence from Google in 2009 extended to this patent when it was acquired by Google when Google purchased Motorola Mobility Inc. in 2012. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 4:15 am
., challenging two Headwater Research Patents; and two IPRs filed by Motorola Solutions Inc., challenging two Sta Group LLC patents. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 4:15 am
., challenging two Headwater Research Patents; and two IPRs filed by Motorola Solutions Inc., challenging two Sta Group LLC patents. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 5:38 am
Karabinis as the inventor and EICES Research, Inc. as the assignee of the patent. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 5:38 am
Karabinis as the inventor and EICES Research, Inc. as the assignee of the patent. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 8:06 am
Be sure to have coffee in hand as you read this: The Board of Directors of Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. considers the maintenance of a sound management to be essential to protecting and enhancing the best interests of the Company (as hereinafter defined) and its stockholders. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
On October 20, 2016, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Motorola Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
On October 20, 2016, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Motorola Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:15 am
This week in Other Barks & Bites: The CAFC issued a precedential decision in Arctic Cat Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:59 am
After Microsoft felt forced for procedural reasons to add Google Inc. to a German patent infringement action originally brought only against its Motorola Mobility subsidiary, a Microsoft v. [read post]
