Search for: "NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER V US"
Results 181 - 200
of 274
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2015, 8:47 am
It has allowed executive branch secrecy to spiral out of control and be used repeatedly to protect abuses of power. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 12:56 pm
Meyer v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Nebraska and Oklahoma v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 11:54 am
(David Zalubowski/AP) Ilya, Jonathan, Randy and I are skeptical about the Nebraska & Oklahoma v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 1:25 pm
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:06 am
In Brown v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
For example, millions still smoke cigarettes, although those risks have been public knowledge for decades. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:47 am
South Carolina v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:40 am
For a (rare) example in which one of these statutes comes up, see Davis v. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm
Schuette v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
U.S. pressure to force Noriega out of power had so far failed. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:43 am
The minority position, represented by Conte v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 5:39 pm
Nebraska, an opinion the vast majority of Progressives approve of. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:01 pm
For us, the coercion argument was much stronger here than it was in Marsh v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:43 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm
By approving Proposal 2 and thereby amending their state constitution, Michigan voters exercised their privilege to enact laws as a basic exercise of their democratic power, bypassing public officials they deemed not responsive to their concerns about a policy of granting race-based preferences. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:22 am
<> Small Nebraska agency might further complicate Keystone fight - the Nebraska Public Service Commission could start its review once TransCanada submits an application, but the company will likely wait to see whether the lower court's ruling stands up against appeals. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:55 pm
” Nebraska Press Assn. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
This one gets less play than the others – perhaps because of how courts sometimes use “communication” to get around it in non-prescription medical product cases (more on that to come), or sometimes because plaintiffs might use the same testimony to claim medical malpractice.But prescriber failure to read can be a powerful tool. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:06 pm
At issue in Schuette v. [read post]
