Search for: "NIKE INC"
Results 181 - 200
of 445
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2011, 4:29 pm
Facebook, Inc., 2011 U.S. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:07 am
Moreover, the Board likened this case to Nike v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:53 pm
Nike Inc., v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
(NEON), and its parent corporation, Nike, Inc., for violations of federal law prohibiting sex and age discrimination. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:02 am
Nike USA, Inc., 1-08-cv-06584 (ILND August 17, 2011, Order) (Holderman, J.) [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 4:34 am
Among the 2013 champs are Bank of America, Office Depot Inc., and Nike Inc. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 4:34 am
Among the 2013 champs are Bank of America, Office Depot Inc., and Nike Inc. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 8:38 am
Reebok International Ltd. has been temporarily ordered to stop making or selling New York Jets merchandise that features the name and number of NFL quarterback Tim Tebow after rival Nike Inc. sued the apparel manufacturer on Tuesday. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 10:29 am
DoubleVerify Inc., 439 P.3d 1156 (Cal. 2019). [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 6:00 pm
– Seattle, WA American Honda Motor Company, Inc. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 2:45 am
February 11, 2020 - 10 AM: In re Max Mara Fashion Group S.r.L, Serial No. 87786944 [Section 2(d) refusal of MAXMARA THE CUBE & Design for various clothing items "related to a customizable coat concept featuring coats and coat components that can be primarily transported within a portable cube carrier," in view of the registered mark THE CUBE for retail store services featuring clothing].February 18, 2020 - 10 AM: Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:47 am
Swisa, Inc. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:24 am
It is difficult to analogize the Nike swoosh or the Nike JUST DO IT mark located on a Nike shirt in a Nike store as somehow a government created limited public forum. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:29 am
” Nike Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
There never was any doubt that the question of whether the infringement of a single design patent by a complex, multifunctional product warrants an unapportioned disgorgement of profits would be an extraordinarily important one. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 12:25 am
In that case, fair use was limited to works that transformed the original through use of parody or satire - this is juxtaposes the current environment, which noticeably reduces the rights of photographers in their works through the expansion of fair use, as evident in Cariou v Prince in 2013, and Rentmeester v Nike, Inc. in 2018.This is further explored through an examination of the Andy Warhol case, which further illustrates the expansion of the fair use exception to the detriment… [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 7:20 am
Leapers, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:43 am
Nike, Inc., 18-728. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:45 am
"Nike, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 12:44 pm
Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. [read post]
