Search for: "NO PARTY v. NO PARTY"
Results 181 - 200
of 119,740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2012, 3:02 am
Regina (Rudewicz) v Secretary of State for Justice (Save Fawley Court Committee and others, interested parties) [2012] EWCA Civ 499; [2012] WLR (D) 121 “It was for the Secretary of State of Justice, as the licensing authority for the exhumation of human remains (other than the power of a consistory court to grant a faculty to exhume human remains interred in consecrated ground of the Anglican Church), to determine on what grounds and in what… [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 11:32 pm
In National Party of Canada v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:15 am
Supreme Court in Christian Legal Society Chapter v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
Following up on my previous posts on NorCal Tea Party Patriots v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
R. 501.5 See United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 6:24 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its opinion in Constitution Party v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 6:50 pm
See Maxwell v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 3:43 pm
Republicans: Is Political Party Affiliation a Significant Demographic Variable in... [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 9:30 am
NAMA Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 2:24 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals, Freeman v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:35 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on third party beneficiary contracts.Here’s the court’s description of the question presented in Sullivan v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm
Law Lessons from Werosta v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 5:00 am
In a recent Pennsylvania Eastern Federal District decision in the case of Leboon v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 8:19 am
In the recent case of Vescio v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 10:19 am
See Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:47 pm
In Thompson v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Rhythm Holding Limited v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
In the case of Seaport Village Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:26 pm
In Oxford Architects Partnership v Cheltenham Ladies College, [2006] EWHC 3156 (TCC), the England and Wales High Court (TCC) held:“The Limitation Act 1980 provides a statutory defence which a party may rely on. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:57 am
A recent legal blogpost flagged a ruling in a labor case published in the Supreme People’s Court’s case database: Su Qiao v. the Taian (Shandong) Municipal Communist Party Disciplinary Inspection Commission. [read post]
