Search for: "Napolitano v. Napolitano" Results 181 - 200 of 246
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2010, 10:09 am by Jon
As it was pointed out in Marbury v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 3:33 pm by Gerard Magliocca
If the system works, Janet Napolitano will never be on the Supreme Court. 2. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 7:13 am by Adam Chandler
Also, Emily Bazelon of Slate discusses City of Ontario v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:39 pm by admin
In October, President Obama signed HR 2892, The Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act of 2010, which contains a provision barring the transfer of Guantanamo detainees onto US soil except to stand trial (see Title V, Sec. 552). [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 6:42 am by Adam Schlossman
Times by Jeffrey Kayes discusses the possibility that Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano may weigh in on the Arizona statute at issue in United States Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm
Janet Napolitano, Homeland Security Secretary, __ F.3d _ (D.C. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 1:40 am
Marshals: Qualifications and Comparison of Demographic Characteristics to Their Counterparts in Selected Federal Law Enforcement Agencies (PDF 139 KB) GAO Correspondence to Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy 11/13/2009 Fact Sheet: Departments of Justice and Defense Announce Forum Decisions for Ten Guantanamo Bay Detainees (PDF 116 KB) Prepared by the Departments of Justice and Defense  11/13/2009 Letter to Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, Utah Attorney General Mark… [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
  It is not yet clear whether Napolitano will decide - or be required - to recuse herself from the matter. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:40 am
Subscription needed for online access: 08/12/2009 Complaint: Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 3:41 am
Subscription needed for online access: 08/06/2009 Annual Report: Budget Review (PDF 702 KB)Prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System08/06/2009 Complaint in the Matter of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]