Search for: "National Federation of Federal Employees v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 3,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm by NARF
(Discrimination; Class Action; Added Parties) United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:56 pm by Michael Kohn
Otherwise, a federal employee has no right to a federal court hearing. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:59 am by Robert Liles
State Auditors further noted that nationally, live discharges from hospice are infrequent (estimated at 6%). [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
(3) Extradition shall also be granted for any offense against a federal law of the United States in which one of the offenses listed in the annexed Schedule, or made extraditable by paragraph (2) of this Article, is a substantial element, even if transporting, transportation, the use of the mails or interstate facilities are also elements of the specific offense. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am by Greg Mersol
And, most recently, the United States District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia  determined that President Obama’s recess appointments in January 2012 were illegal. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:54 am by Heidi Henson
A federal district court in South Carolina has invalidated the NLRB's rule requiring employers to post notice in the workplace informing employees of their NLRA rights (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, April 13, 2012, Norton, D). [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 5:31 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Federal Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2017.htmlPenobscot Nation v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 7:14 am by Vandenack Weaver LLC
Plaintiff Bigger asked the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois to conditionally certify a collective action class and to authorize opt-in notice to a national collective of fellow Facebook Client Solutions Managers. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:27 am
Hinnant, and Michael Nichols [hereinafter collectively referred to as Bey] are former tenured New York City Correction Department officers.Identifying themselves as "Black and of Moorish national origin,” and believing that they were exempt from federal and state taxes, they filed Federal and New York State tax forms claiming exemptions from income tax withholdings. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm by Olivia Cross
  [6.18.2020] In what will likely be seen as a landmark decision for years to come, on Monday, June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down an opinion in the case Bostock v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:00 am
On May 24, 2010, the United States Supreme Court decided another employment law case. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:00 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
On May 24, 2010, the United States Supreme Court decided another employment law case. [read post]