Search for: "Natural Resources Defense Council v. Administrator" Results 181 - 200 of 575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2012, 3:24 am by David S. Dessen, Esq.
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. required the Court to uphold the Secretary’s decision. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:24 am by David S. Dessen, Esq.
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. required the Court to uphold the Secretary’s decision. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:31 am by Kalvis Golde
Natural Resources Defense Council, the Magnuson-Stevens Act implicitly grants the National Marine Fisheries Service the power to force domestic vessels to pay the salaries of the monitors they must carry; and (2) whether the court should overrule Chevron, or at least clarify that statutory silence concerning controversial powers expressly but narrowly granted elsewhere in the statute does not constitute an ambiguity requiring deference to the… [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc., courts have deferred to agencies’ reasonable interpretation of statutes. [read post]
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842-43 (1984), the Court determined that the statutory language establishing the exemptions, section 13(a)(1) of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842-43 (1984), the Court determined that the statutory language establishing the exemptions, section 13(a)(1) of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:14 am by Brianne Gorod
Natural Resources Defense Council, the Supreme Court held that when a statute is ambiguous, courts must defer to a reasonable interpretation of that statute by the agency charged with administering it. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:37 am by Emily Bremer
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:59 pm by Miriam Seifter
  The dispute between petitioner American Trucking Associations (ATA) and respondent Los Angeles (and the Natural Resources Defense Council, a respondent on the City’s side) arises out of plans to expand the Port of Los Angeles, an independent division of the City and the nation’s largest port. [read post]
HollyFrontier argues that the EPA should be allowed deferential treatment in interpreting legislation as established in Chevron USA Inc. v Natural Resource Defense Council, Inc. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 4:34 pm
Natural Resources Defense Council. [read post]
” In a tweet, the Natural Resources Defense Council said “today’s Supreme Court ruling puts people and vulnerable communities in harm’s way. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 5:27 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), and Auer v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:16 am by Ronald Mann
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., which requires courts to defer to reasonable agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes. [read post]