Search for: "Neill v State"
Results 181 - 200
of 672
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2020, 1:17 pm
The states were joined by two individual plaintiffs, Neill Hurley and John Nantz, who are subject to the individual mandate. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 179-180 [1978]). [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 179-180 [1978]). [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 10:01 pm
") THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:37 am
On May 20, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 6:46 am
At issue are certified questions of state law from the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:39 pm
Going to the regulators: FTC, state AGs. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 10:51 am
From yesterday's Ohio Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:47 am
Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:20 am
State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 5:58 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 7:43 am
State ex. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:01 am
State v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
"Contrary to the [Respondents'] contention, the proceeding was not rendered academic by its post-commencement disclosure of records in response to some of the [Plaintiff] requests, since an actual controversy between the parties still exists concerning whether the [Plaintiff's] remaining requests are exempt from disclosure (see Matter of Barry v O'Neill, 185 AD3d 503, 505; cf. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
"Contrary to the [Respondents'] contention, the proceeding was not rendered academic by its post-commencement disclosure of records in response to some of the [Plaintiff] requests, since an actual controversy between the parties still exists concerning whether the [Plaintiff's] remaining requests are exempt from disclosure (see Matter of Barry v O'Neill, 185 AD3d 503, 505; cf. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 6:29 am
State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 7:00 pm
By Kevin O’Neill In a recent British Columbia Supreme Court decision, Gerry Miller v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:03 am
”) State v. [read post]