Search for: "New York v. New York Telephone Co." Results 181 - 200 of 433
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In 2015, the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division – First Department, was faced with two matters, both of which addressed whether bonds issued to entities formed for the purposes of investing and trading in securities, covered losses the entities sustained by investing in Madoff’s Ponzi scheme.[7]  In 2009, Madoff pleaded guilty to 11 federal felonies and was sentenced to 150 years in prison, the maximum allowed. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, sorts out the issues involved in the battle between Apple and the government, in light of all the circumstances, including the February 29, 2016 opinion by Eastern District of New York Judge James Orenstein in the separate Apple iPhone unlocking case. [read post]
Rural Telephone Service Co, Inc. provides that a work only requires a “modicum of creativity” to be considered “original. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am by Podhurst Orseck
Wiener, co-chair of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act defense practice at Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 10:53 am
 This argument formed the basis of the dissent to one of the key cases the FBI relies upon,  United States v New York Telephone Co., 434 US159 (1977). [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
After the Supreme Court issued its decision last week in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:02 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Visit our offices located around New York Metropolitan for free legal consultation. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:40 am by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
The New York Times writes that a confirmation of an attack on the plane “will only strengthen Mr. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:53 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York 2012). [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 10:50 am by Francesca Procaccini
The burden analysis derives from the Supreme Court’s New York Tel Co. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 8:30 pm
 So off to Google Scholar (New York state court cases) and the AAA's No-Fault Award Service page I went. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:29 am
The originality standard is a minimal degree of creativity as stipulated in Feist Publications v Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991). [read post]