Search for: "North Dakota v. Long" Results 181 - 200 of 427
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2007, 7:04 am
North Dakota (06-564) was an attempt to take advantage of the Court's 2004 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:26 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Yellowstone River flows northward from Wyoming into Montana, then on into North Dakota before emptying into the Missouri River. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 8:30 am by azatty
She has taught law at the University of Kansas, the University of North Dakota and the University of Wisconsin School of Law. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:33 am by bryannewland
Supreme Court issued its decision in Seminole Tribe v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Wetch, a challenge to North Dakota’s mandatory bar dues, that the court of appeals reconsider the case in light of Janus v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
App. 1991) (“[a] hospital that utilizes an alleged defective product only in the course of its primary function of providing medical services is not subject to an action of strict liability where the professional services could not have been rendered without using the product”); North Miami General Hospital, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 2:51 am by SHG
, North Dakota, and Utah (self-study only). ? [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and if so how it is applied, careful… [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 1:07 pm by Mark Walsh
She explains the holding that the North Dakota convenience store’s lawsuit against the Fed over interchange fees for debit card transactions was not time-barred under the default six-year federal statute of limitations. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 9:34 pm
They hold valid North Dakota driver's licenses, are registered to vote in North Dakota, and maintain North Dakota bank accounts. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:26 am by Blue Blog
Williams County, the North Dakota Supreme Court recognized the “active interference” exception. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:26 am by Blue Blog
Williams County, the North Dakota Supreme Court recognized the “active interference” exception. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:26 am by Blue Blog
Williams County, the North Dakota Supreme Court recognized the “active interference” exception. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:24 pm by Jon L. Gelman
S. 706, 728.Consistent with these principles, the Court long ago found structural waiver as to suits between States, see South Dakota v. [read post]