Search for: "ORDER RELATING TO APPLICATIONS OR PETITIONS"
Results 181 - 200
of 5,348
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2006, 4:55 am
The Court will first release an Orders List relating to its Conference of 11/21; we will bring you coverage of that as soon as it is released (our list of "petitions to watch" for Tuesday's Conference is here). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 4:45 am
See Verified Petition in Merkin v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm
We have created a new facebook group to address the impact of the new executive order and other changing developments related to COVID-19. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 6:43 am
The petitioner’s failure to appreciate PPD as a necessary party as the lot’s title owner does not satisfy the elements needed in order to invoke the relation back doctrine. [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:05 am
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit involves petitions for review of the FCC’s “USF/ICC Transformation Order” establishing the Connect America Fund for federal broadband subsidies. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
Comment This section and others in Article III describe a system of administration of decedents’ estates which gives interested persons control of whether matters relating to estates will become occasions for judicial orders. [read post]
28 May 2013, 6:43 pm
While petitioner and the Law Guardian opposed such an application. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm
In its conference of December 2, 2016, the court will consider petitions involving issues such as whether the Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Act pre-empts a state court’s order directing a veteran to indemnify a former spouse for a reduction in the former spouse’s portion of the veteran’s military retirement pay, when that reduction results from the veteran’s post-divorce waiver of retirement pay in order to… [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:46 pm
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 8:21 am
The focus of the petition is the “reasonable certainty” indefiniteness standard in relation to the un-expressed elements of an invention claimed using the transitional phrase “consisting essentially of. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:44 pm
For even more immigration information related to COVID-19 please visit our Immigration and COVID-19 Resource Center here. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 5:46 pm
We have created a new facebook group to address the impact of the new executive order and other changing developments related to COVID-19. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 2:34 pm
A temporary order in a proceeding brought for custody, dissolution, legal separation, or related matters may not vacate or modify an order granted under the Domestic Abuse Act restraining an abusing party from committing acts of domestic abuse. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 12:27 pm
Applicant testified that the first time he became aware that his orthopedic complaints were work-related was when he was evaluated by Dr. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:24 am
Our live-blog coverage of the orders is available here; the full order list is here. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 11:58 am
” MASA petition. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 10:34 am
They can use this tool to request a follow-up on their case status if they do not receive documents related to three of our most-used forms: Form I-485, Application to Adjust Permanent Residence or Adjust Status; Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization; and Form I-130, Petition for Alien Relative. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
The full order list is available here. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:40 am
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 6:05 am
Those who may be affected by the ruling include those who are married or related to a U.S. citizen or a legal resident who has filed a petition on their behalf. [read post]
