Search for: "OXLEY v. STATE"
Results 181 - 200
of 649
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2016, 11:02 pm
The ARB’s decision was issued in Dietz v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post, on June 8, 2016, the SEC, in what one commentator called “the most significant SEC cybersecurity-related action to date,” announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC had agreed to pay a $1 million penalty to settle charges that as a result of its alleged failure to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data, some customer information was hacked and offered for sale online. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:12 pm
In Stein, the Sixth Circuit stated that IndyMac represented “the more cogent and persuasive rule. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:34 am
State Law” Practice Area, the US Supreme Court unanimously held – in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 6:00 am
Dietz v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 2:33 pm
[iii] One driver may be the state of the economy in the United States today. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:06 am
Megan Messina, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 7:47 am
Because of this ambiguity, under Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:36 am
Therefore, the Third Circuit affirmed summary judgment in his employer’s favor (Wiest v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 4:05 am
Major, Religion and Law in R v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
July 31, 2015) — Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower provisions. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 3:28 am
The two men also agreed to not sign any Sarbanes-Oxley certifications or file certain periodic reports with the Commission for a period of 12 months and to not violate the federal securities laws (SEC v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:28 am
Congress expressly stated that SOX and Dodd-Frank supplement existing remedies, so they could not bar the CFO from proceeding (Becker v Community Health Systems, Inc., September 17, 2015, Johnson, J.). [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:30 am
Burwell v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:50 am
Colo. 2013); Murray v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:59 pm
In Asadi v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 7:35 am
Rather, internal whistleblowing that is protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is protected activity sufficient to state a claim under Dodd-Frank, according to the SEC. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 7:35 am
Rather, internal whistleblowing that is protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is protected activity sufficient to state a claim under Dodd-Frank, according to the SEC. [read post]
