Search for: "Other Defendants-Class III-a, Class III-b, Class III-c"
Results 181 - 200
of 473
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
Part III discusses the original Florida Statute Prior to Senate Bill 378. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
Part III discusses the original Florida Statute Prior to Senate Bill 378. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 10:52 am
” In Johnston, the defendants brought their motion to dismiss for lack of Article III standing at the pleadings stage under Rule 12(b)(1). [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
There are many other relists that warrant your close attention, including the “biosimilar” cases (Sandoz Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am
§ 271(e)(2)(C)(ii). [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am
Substantive rules include a “prohibiti[on of] a certain category of punishment for a class of defendants because of their status or offense. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
The Ninth Circuit agreed: The rule that a removed case in which the plaintiff lacks Article III standing must be remanded to state court under § 1447(c) applies as well to a case removed pursuant to CAFA as to any other type of removed case. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 8:51 am
Anthem I also dismissed claims as to certain defendants on the grounds that there were no factual allegations going to the involvement of those defendants. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 11:45 am
You and I both know he still has favors in [C]larksburg! [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 6:06 pm
During this same period, the dismissal rate for other nonfinancial cases actually declined slightly. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
Strong corporate leaders, like those who populate the c-suite at Morgan Stanley, seek answers from independent and neutral sources of information. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
The Section agrees that, under the circumstances specified in Article 3 of the Draft Provisions, the company should be added as a defendant, and suggests a few revisions to clarify some aspects. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
Defendants again demurred. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm
This hack led to a putative class action complaint being filed against OPM and others in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in late June, 2015.[6] As in the customer cases discussed above, the gravamen of the employee complaint against OPM is inaction. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm
§ 78u-5(c). [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 1:21 pm
§ 211(c). [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:26 am
C 15-03995, 2016 U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 10:40 am
And then in May 2013, plaintiff was found responsible for interfering with a learning environment by disrupting class. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 8:30 pm
) (3) (a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this subsection (3), if the loss, damage, value of services, or thing of value taken, or cost of restoration or repair caused by a violation of this section is: (I) Less than fifty dollars, computer crime is a class 1 petty offense; (II) Fifty dollars or more but less than three hundred dollars, computer crime is a class 3 misdemeanor; (III) Three hundred dollars or more but less than seven… [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 3:13 pm
Mainly because I can’t really tell who is in the proposed class: The Settlement Class is defined as: a) all Persons who, at any time since September 3, 1949, directly paid Defendants, Intervenors or their predecessors-in-interest (or either’s Affiliates) for each such Person’s use of the Song; (b) all Persons who, at any time since September 3, 1949, directly paid HFA, Alfred or Faber as agents for Defendants or their… [read post]
