Search for: "Other Interested Parties Amended"
Results 181 - 200
of 18,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2007, 9:21 am
Pre-publication of the proposed amendments allows interested parties (and Canadians in general) to review and provide final comments on the amendments. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 2:06 am
Further, the record does not demonstrate that the other shareholders affirmed [plaintiff’s] purported sale of the shares to the third party after discovering it. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 2:22 pm
Last summer, all nine justices on the Supreme Court agreed that even if we store electronic communications with a third party provider, we still have Fourth Amendment-protected privacy interests in those communications. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 10:26 am
There are two respondents — the previous and current presidents of the college in question – and they disagree with each other on the First Amendment question. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 11:45 am
The other two proposed amendments are for smaller stakes. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 11:34 am
Additionally, the amendments prohibit shareholders from aggregating their securities with other shareholders for the purpose of meeting the ownership requirements. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:45 am
Among other things, the provisions with regard to conflicting interest have been thoroughly reviewed and strongly curtailed. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:59 pm
As pled in the proposed amended pleading, both parties are experienced and sophisticated players in the life settlement industry, of relatively equal bargaining power, and involved in a complex commercial undertaking. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 12:24 am
This first new round of amendments to the Competition Act, which was intended to strengthen the ability of the Competition Bureau (Bureau) and private parties to enforce Canadian competition law and enhance competition in Canada overall, includes fundamental changes to Canadian competition law. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:34 pm
The amendment draft extends special jurisdiction rules to cover “disputes relating to property right or interest, and right or interest other than property” (Art. 276, para. 1). [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 3:44 am
IP Australia has released an ‘exposure draft’ of a proposed Intellectual Property Amendment Bill 2014, and is inviting interested parties to make written submissions on the draft bill and associated draft explanatory memorandum by 7 February 2014.The draft bill is a revised version of the Intellectual Property Laws Amendment Bill 2013, which narrowly missed out on being passed in the Senate (after having made it through the House of Representatives)… [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:15 am
Now that the 10th anniversary of the America Invents Act (AIA) has passed, we can look back not only at the past decade, but also the reactions of various interested parties and how they responded to that anniversary. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
The other has to do with designation of experts who are not retained by parties. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 8:16 am
The Department of Transport has promulgated a notice calling on parties to make submissions by 28 September 2023 on the proposed amendments to the National Ports Act (NPA). [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 3:35 pm
As I wrote acouple of weeks ago, the probate rules were amended effective July 1, 2015. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 3:15 pm
Time to Appeal Currently, the claimant or any interested party has seven calendar days from delivery of the notification of an initial determination, or ten calendar days from when the Division mails the notification to the claimant’s or interested party’s address, to file an appeal. [read post]
6 May 2010, 8:53 am
Both are very interesting. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 5:21 pm
Where the parties are involved in the same dispute, one party institutes an action in a foreign court, while the other party institutes an action in a people’s court, or one party institutes an action in both a foreign court and a people’s court, the people’s court which has jurisdiction in accordance with this law may accept the action. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 7:52 am
By Ethan Ackerman While the 4th Amendment gets litigated more often than, say, the 10th Amendment, it is still rare when a court finds federal law unconstitutional for inadequately protecting a 4th Amendment interest in email's privacy. [read post]
7 May 2013, 1:42 am
” In light of these other rulings, Judge Buchwald declined the request of several parties to lift the stay that has remained in place. [read post]
