Search for: "Ovens v. Ovens" Results 181 - 200 of 291
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2012, 3:02 am
In it, Alan juxtaposes some still-smouldering embers of last month's British case law with a cookie that may soon be in the oven in the United States. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm by admin
   Property exempt from execution. (1) (a) An individual is entitled to exemption of the following property: (i) a burial plot for the individual and the individual’s family; (ii) health aids reasonably necessary to enable the individual or a dependent to work or sustain health; (iii) benefits the individual or the individual’s dependent have received or are entitled to receive from any source because of: (A) disability; (B) illness; or (C) unemployment; (iv) benefits paid… [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 4:55 am by Dianne Saxe
However, the plaintiffs’ chances of ultimate success will be significantly reduced  if the Smith v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:47 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Glynn Lunney: He heard an argument for reduced damages for unauthorized users who create value, but that doesn’t implicate blocking copyrights as in Gracen v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:21 am by Dianne Saxe
Class actions for historic contamination: Sydney Tar Ponds and Smith v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:32 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In the Erie County trial court case of Boyd v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:33 am by SHG
  Cooper and its companion case, Missouri v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:39 am by Russ Bensing
  As the 8th District’s decision last week in State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:09 am by Dianne Saxe
The Nova Scotia Supreme Court has certified a massive class action by Sydney residents against the governments of Canada and Nova Scotia, relating to contamination from the notorious Sydney tar ponds, and the associated steel mill and coke ovens from the old Sydney Steel. [read post]