Search for: "P. v. Smart"
Results 181 - 200
of 417
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2015, 10:23 am
The attorneys at James P. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:17 am
FTC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Miller and White are helping the Texas Civil Rights Project represent a South Texas couple, Rolando and Miriam Pérez, in Pérez v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 4:45 pm
In any case, that slight delay allows me to benefit richly from the analyses posted by some very smart colleagues. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
(Discussion Draft, p. 82.) [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:50 am
(Nov. 25, 2012)As of January 2014, 90% of American adults had a cell phone, 58% had a smart phone, and 81% of American adults used these phones to send and receive text messages.Courts . . . are taking note. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 7:06 am
Supreme Court last week in the case of Dollar General Corporation v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:38 am
Of course, there are plenty of smart judges out there. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 5:58 am
Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
Huff v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:25 am
Huff v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 6:03 pm
” Vieth v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Session 2: Establishing the Features of the Consumer The UK courts have in recent years been quite explicit that the consumer is a normative construct, a fiction, and a benchmark. [read post]
26 May 2015, 11:46 am
Proponents: Erin Mackey, Institute for Public Representation, Georgetown Law (counsel for Consumers Union) George P. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 8:40 am
Smart, 195 N.C. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
The controlling case is Robak v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 3:38 pm
Also on LXBN, I have a piece about the French anti-anorexia amendment which isn’t smart enough to be effective, and our director of product management Joshua Lynch explains how non-responsive blogs are holding your content back. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:21 am
In Matter of Gina P. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:42 am
* Magnetic attraction and the power of 4: seeking the right equation for comparison of trade marksValentina reports on CJEU’s decision in C-182/14 P MEGA Brands International v OHIM, the last episode of the Magnext case [on which see IPKat’s earlier post here]. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:50 am
That’s a good market, he’s very smart”. [read post]
