Search for: "P. v. Song"
Results 181 - 200
of 568
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2008, 7:33 am
In Atlantic v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 3:32 am
-->_qacct="p-a5YZ00fCRWn7o";quantserve(); [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 4:22 am
In Three Boys Music v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 5:20 am
-->_qacct="p-a5YZ00fCRWn7o";quantserve(); [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Paris v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 7:52 am
-->_qacct="p-a5YZ00fCRWn7o";quantserve(); [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 3:45 am
-->_qacct="p-a5YZ00fCRWn7o";quantserve(); [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 11:49 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:36 pm
We still need to know how likely it is that a 6 note sequence will show up in 2 songs due to copying v. not copying/independent creation. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 11:18 am
In Arista v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
As the old song goes, we all need somebody to lean on. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 4:34 am
In UMG v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:49 pm
Swierkiewicz v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
-->_qacct="p-a5YZ00fCRWn7o";quantserve(); [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am
Hart v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 3:25 pm
("UMG") owns the copyright to numerous songs and produces CDs containing those songs. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 10:38 am
Thomas (Renamed Capital v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 1:03 pm
In Lava Records v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 3:32 am
Recent reports by Variety and by the Associated Press underscore the potential importance of the class action brought by Tanya Andersen against the RIAA, the record companies, Media Sentry and others, Andersen v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 8:37 am
We mentioned that on December 7, 2009, Judge Gertner of the District Court of Massachusetts issued a decision in Sony BMG Music v. [read post]
