Search for: "P. v. Song"
Results 181 - 200
of 568
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2014, 3:59 am
Francescatti v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 11:15 am
[Compare [No Doubt v. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 10:00 am
ABKCO v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
This has been tried in the Ferrat case in which the singer-songwriter Jean Ferrat filed suit to prevent his songs to be included in a compilation with songs ranging radically against his political positions” (p.44).The Report further notes that French law may have difficulty to comprehend transformative works because both the patrimonial rights and the moral rights of the author may have to be enforced. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 1:04 am
Williams, 84 F.3d at 589 (“[P]lacing dinosaurs on a prehistoric island far from the mainland amounts to no more than a scene a faire in a dinosaur adventure story. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:41 am
In Arguellez v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
The TTAB cited the recent Stone Lion Capital Partners, LP v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
Taking a sad song and making it better, St. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 11:24 am
Rambo, 279 P.3d 361, 365 (2012) review denied, 296 P.3d 1275 (Or. 2013). [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:30 am
At Greenwire, Jeremy P. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 8:27 am
P wrote song “Natasha,” on similar theme. [read post]
19 May 2014, 10:40 am
However, the ninth federal US circuit has extended the laches doctrine to bar both legal and equitable claims (see DANJAQ, LLC v Sony Corp., 263 F.3d 942, 962 (9th Cir. 2001)), while other federal circuits reject laches as a absolute defence to copyright legal claims: see Lyons P’ship LP v Morris Costumes Inc., 243 F.3d 789, 797 (4th Cir. 2001) and Chirco v Crosswinds Communities Inc., 474 F.3d 227, 234 (6th Cir. 2007). [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
P. 15(a). [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:19 am
A Political Autobiography; Lester Julius’ Look Out Whitey, Black Power’s Gon Get Your Mama; Bobby Seale, Seize the Time: The Story of the Black Panther Party and Huey P. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:04 pm
Up to $8000 per work—the statute says up to $150,000, but a jury has awarded that in Capitol Records v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:03 am
But access is now potentially on both sides of the equation, not just incentives v. access. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in Campbell v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Croson, by Reginald Oh & Thomas RossThe Song Remains the Same: The Story of Whren v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 11:48 am
DLC Plastering, Inc., supra, 154 Cal.App.4th at p. 1366.) [read post]
