Search for: "PARTY CITY HOLDINGS, INC."
Results 181 - 200
of 2,296
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2010, 6:51 am
A week later the parties separated, and the husband was admitted to Tri-City Medical Center for treatment for a severe emotional illness. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:22 pm
City of Victorville (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Real Party in Interest) (4th Dist., Div. 1) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2016 WL 3098915.) [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 1:26 pm
The judge also distinguished the United States Supreme Court’s holding in American Express Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:49 pm
The Ninth Circuit’s Holding On Inclusion of Cash In Lieu Benefits in the Regular Rate The primary issue on appeal was whether the City’s cash in lieu payments were properly excluded from the City’s regular rate. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:27 am
LEXIS 16014 (One who holds legal title to a mortgaged property is an indispensable party in suit to foreclose a mortgage). [read post]
7 May 2016, 9:34 am
RR Westminister Holding, Inc., 7 S.W.3d 581 (Tenn. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 10:23 am
City of South San Francisco (Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, Inc., Real Party In Interest) (1st Dist., Div. 1, 2017) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 10:23 am
City of South San Francisco (Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, Inc., Real Party In Interest) (1st Dist., Div. 1, 2017) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 4:34 pm
In City of North Miami Beach Gen. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:57 am
Enterasys Networks, Inc., 2004 WL 936505 at *2-3, the Court determined that whether a party prevailed in a case is determined by reference to substantive issues, not damages. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 4:22 pm
Vonachen Services, Inc., 2021 WL 4876943 (C.D. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 8:33 am
There were 63 parties in this case. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 2:26 pm
City of New York, 130 S. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:35 pm
The garnishee is a third party who owes a debt to or holds property of the debtor. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 7:09 am
Google and Twitter Inc., v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 10:24 am
WEINSTEIN AND SONS, INC., a Florida corporation, and ABRAHAM RESNICK, individually, Appellees. 4th District.Attorneys -- Disqualification -- Conflict of interest -- Motion to disqualify defendant's counsel in action for breach of non-disclosure agreement where defendant's counsel had represented plaintiff in other non-disclosure agreement matters ten years earlier -- Trial court erred in denying motion for disqualification on grounds of the time that had passed since the prior… [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 7:15 am
Consequently, the forum selection clause “did not displace UBS and Citi’s arbitration obligation. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
Bruce Church, Inc., 397 U. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 8:21 am
Citigroup Inc., No. 22-1000-bk (Bankr. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 12:44 pm
Hennessy Industries Inc. v. [read post]
