Search for: "PERSON v. STATE" Results 181 - 200 of 84,845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2008, 2:33 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A person could not be extradited to the United States of America to stand trial on charges brought under US legislation which declared cartels to be illegal, to stand trial for price-fixing offences alleged to have been committed from 1989 to 2000 because during that period price-fixing agreements and cartels were not illegal under English law, unless there were other aggravating… [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 2:12 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “When a person appealed against an order for deportation because he feared torture or ill-treatment in his home state, in scrutinising the case, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission was entitled to take into account closed as well as open material. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:25 am
Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform v Neufeld and Another Court of Appeal “A person who was a majority shareholder and director of a company could also be an employee of that company under a contract of employment, even if he had total control of the company. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 5:09 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the petition: US v Bryant Cert Petition Question presented: Section 117(a) of Title 18, United States Code, makes it a federal crime for any person to “commit[] a domestic assault within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States or Indian country” if the person “has a final conviction on at least 2 separate prior occasions in Federal, State, or Indian tribal court proceedings for”… [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Facts of United States v Aguilar United States District Judge Robert Aguilar was convicted of one count of illegally disclosing a wiretap in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 5:10 am by MBettman
Merit Decision On July 28, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 2:39 am by tracey
It was, however, incumbent upon the member states to ensure that their legislation contained criteria which enabled those persons to obtain a decision on their application for entry and residence that was founded on an extensive examination of their personal circumstances and, in the event of refusal, was justified by reasons. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:45 pm by Ettinger Law Firm
In the recent case, Heiting v. the United States, an appellate court denied a claim-of-right deduction in accordance with Section 1341 of the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]