Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 181 - 200
of 4,534
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2013, 1:17 pm
We've been informed by counsel that the Dobbs litigation - the case that brought us Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 3:32 pm
The Court concluded that the imposition of any sanctions would not be productive and that further pursuit of contempt issues would not be useful at this time. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:01 pm
The Supreme Court said the lower court used the wrong standard. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:10 am
On Tuesday, December 6, the Court heard argument in a case – Martel v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:20 pm
Over the next few days, I’ll post (and combine using the Snyder v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:37 am
Also, GoDaddy didn’t “use” the domain name in commerce (cites to Petroliam Nasional Berhad v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 7:07 am
On January 11, 2016, the Fourth Circuit decided Armstrong v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:28 am
Using standard contract terms may not work particularly well in non-competes, as they can have unintended consequences for employers. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:41 pm
(E.g., People v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 2:11 pm
True, Hardison used the phrase "de minimis" in describing an employer's obligation, but other language in the decision suggested a stricter standard. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 11:51 am
The “red flag” knowledge standard in US law is certainly far from crystal clear, but such knowledge can never be presumed. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
” Under this standard, there was no need to look “extend beyond the facial neutrality of the order. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:23 pm
The recent explosion of media coverage over the California arrival of David Beckham got me thinking about the use -- or more precisely, the "fair use" -- of his name in the title of the motion picture Bend It Like Beckham. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:52 pm
I have indeed used the ROUND function on some occasions. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 11:58 am
Republic of Argentina, federal courts in New York followed the standard paradigm and attached great importance to the precise choice of words of the boilerplate contracts at issue. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 6:24 am
"These legal standards give plaintiff the win. [read post]
4 May 2021, 1:42 am
In November 2020, the Dusseldorf Regional Court decided to refer to the Luxembourg-based Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) two sets of legal questions: one about the component-level licensing of standard-essential patents (SEPs) and another about the application of the Huawei v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 5:15 pm
First, if there is but a single precise value for the FRAND royalty, it is likely that parties, in private bilateral negotiations over SEP licenses, will agree on some royalty rate that differs from this precise value. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:07 am
That brings us to more than 40 hours per week. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 2:49 pm
On Monday, in Martel v. [read post]
