Search for: "PROVIDE COMMERCE, INC." Results 181 - 200 of 4,014
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
In 2011, “the Division of Corporation Finance issued interpretive guidance providing [its] views concerning operating companies’ disclosure obligations relating to cybersecurity. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 3:57 am
Section 45 of the Lanham Act provides that, for goods, a mark is in use in commerce if "it is placed in any manner on the goods or their containers or the displays associated therewith or on the tags or labels affixed thereto" and "the goods are sold or transported in commerce. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:44 am by Marcia Delgadillo
On June 6, 2023, the SEC charged Coinbase, Inc. and Coinbase Global, Inc. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
Abitron garnered far less attention than did other intellectual property (IP) cases argued this term, including Jack Daniels Products, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 10:33 am by NARF
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2022-2023update.html One Petition for certiorari was filed on 7/3/23: Bird Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
The scholars contend that the administration has distorted the meaning of the HEROES Act of 2003 to provide the legal justification for student loan forgiveness. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:25 am by Lindsay Colvin Stone
 We will continue to monitor the impact of the Supreme Court’s decision in Groff and provide updates as they become available. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:30 am by Minyao Wang
In response, Alito stated that this case does not provide the “occasion to address the precise contours of” the phrase “use in commerce. [read post]
On the other hand, US trademark Law (Lanham Act) provides that in order to a confer to a trademark exclusive right the trademark must be used in commerce, with the consequence that if the applicant of an intent-to-use trademark application does not furnish evidence of use within the prescribed period, the trademark application is considered to be abandoned, and no exclusive rights are granted. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
There was insufficient evidence of reputational injury as an alternative theory; Industria didn’t provide any evidence even showing that it had any particular US reputation to be harmed. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
The Press Gazette and Zelo Street also provide commentary. [read post]