Search for: "PROVIDENCE AC, INC."
Results 181 - 200
of 524
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm
The dust-up in Delaware over fee-shifting bylaws got started in May 2014, when the Delaware Supreme Court in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:14 am
In this post, Nicola provides further food for thought, introducing into the discussion the concept of the zero-sum game.* A Kat's 2015 Copyright AwardsLike last year and the year before, Eleonora reviews the copyright year, awarding a number of prizes to the most relevant developments occurred in 2015. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:42 pm
But Employer #2 might still lose if costly training which it provided is wasted or its project engagements are impaired by an adverse USCIS adjudication on the same-or-similar-job issue. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
.* I financed it so it's my copyright--well, not reallyKat friend Aaron Wood has provided an edifying summary of a recent case from the UK Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, Henry Hadaway Organisation v Pickwick Group Limited and Ors [2015] EWHC 3407 (IPEC), concerning the vexing question that copyright practitioners know all too well: Who is the owner of the copyright in a recording where one party finances and the other is the creative/organiser? [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
* Boards of Appeal tell AC: we were never consultedAs Eponia Emperor’s Mr Battistelli presents to Board 28 an updated proposal addressed to the AC, the Boards’ Praesidium writes to the AC members in frustration, disputing that they were properly consulted, and asking for their voices to be heard. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 10:57 am
Also, I am completely in favor of the movement to ACE, which will provide demonstrable benefits to the trade. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 9:29 am
Danek Medical, Inc., 2000 U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 5:31 am
In Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
The dust-up in Delaware over fee-shifting bylaws got started in May 2014, when the Delaware Supreme Court in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:40 pm
************************************ On June 11, 2015, New York’s Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed the Appellate Division, First Department’s decision in ACE Securities Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
In agreeing to hear Tyson’s case, the Court took no action on a pair of petitions raising similar issues, by the huge retail chain, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
26 May 2015, 12:53 pm
., Ltd. of Tokyo, Japan; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. of Parsippany, New Jersey; and Ube Industries, Ltd of Yamaguchi, Japan filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that HEC Pharm USA, Inc. of Princeton, New Jersey and HEC Pharm Co. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:55 am
The first point arises from the relationship between the new tort of misuse of private information (recently recognised in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311) and the HRA. [read post]
1 May 2015, 12:36 pm
DB Structured Products, Inc., a closely-watched case that will have far-reaching implications for residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) repurchase litigation and potentially beyond. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:15 am
This lawsuit adds another two new Defendants, Lupin Ltd. and Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm
It is now over ten years since the landmark decision in Campbell v MGN Ltd ([2004] 2 AC 457) established the misuse of private information (“MOPI”) tort (any lingering doubt that it might not be a tort has been eradicated by the Court of Appeal decision in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311). [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has issued a provisional full version of its 2014 Report, which covers the work of the Court of Justice, the General Court and the Civil Service Tribunal, and provides yummy information for IP aficionados. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
And here it is:* WIPO Roving Seminars: a Kat samples oneThe World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has run a pair of Roving Seminars in Israel to bring to IP owners and practitioners a greater understanding of what services WIPO provides and how those services can facilitate users' commercial plans. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:50 pm
"Article 6bis of the Paris Convention (1967) shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to goods or services which are not similar to those in respect of which a trademark is registered", provides Article 16(3) of our beloved TRIPS. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
Darren provide further food for thoughts on the recent couple of Board of Appeal decisions G2/12 Tomatoes II and G3/12 Broccoli II, which related to an exception to patentability and which David reported on this weblog a few days ago.* BREAKING NEWS: It's official -- the law is an ASOS, or is it an ASSOS ...? [read post]
