Search for: "PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY v. CORPORATION COMMISSION" Results 181 - 200 of 1,186
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm by WIMS
Federal Election Commission (Case No. 08-205) [See WIMS 1/22/10]. [read post]
We also expect more disclosure, given the Commission’s endorsement of the principle expressed in the seminal case of TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Sugar (Deceased) v British Broadcasting Corporation and anor, heard 23 November 2011. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm by Blog Editorial
Winston Gibson v Public Service Commission; Ranjan Rampersad v Commissioner of Police and Police Service Commission; Robert Ramsahai v Teaching Service Commission; Ashford Sankar & Others v Public Service Commission; Gopichand Ganga and Others v Commissioner of Police and Others; and Hermia Tyson-Cuffie v Public Service… [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
In support, the Second Circuit cites a "diversity, equity, and inclusion" consultant who charges companies for "consulting packages" to implement "corporate social responsibility" programs, as well as a "survey" commissioned by a marketing company that "strives to insert the brand's social mission and innovations into mainstream conversations through traditional and social media. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
United States Steel Corporation, a 27-page opinion, Judge Bailey writes:Northern Indiana Public Service Company ("NIPSCO") appeals the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission's ("IURC" or "Commission") grant of United States Steel Corporation's ("U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
It is to be noted that, as defined by General Construction Law §66, a “public corporation” includes a “public benefit corporation” such as ECMCC. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 7:47 pm by Race to the Bottom
The acquired private company benefits from the ability to go public while circumventing the complicated initial public offering (“IPO”) process. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:52 am by Florian Mueller
If there is any company whose business the DG GROW initiative is really designed to grow, it's neither an innovator nor an implementer of standards (neither side likes the proposal): it's just IPlytics, a service provider. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 4:55 am by Sam E. Antar
SEC Division of Corporation Finance discovers previously undisclosed overpayment error In responding to questions from the SEC Division of Corporation Finance, Overstock.com disclosed that in February 2009 the company learned it overpaid a fulfillment partner $785,000 during 2008. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Gary Gensler
The Securities Act of 1933 was about companies raising money from the public. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 3:13 am by Chijioke Ifeoma Okorie
Gte/Ltd and the Corporate Affairs Commission FHC/L/CS/341/09 decided recently on 22nd October 2018. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Commission is merit neutral and does not take a view on particular companies, investments, or the assets underlying an ETP. [read post]
On July 16, the European Union Court of Justice (ECJ) handed down its judgment in Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]