Search for: "Parente v. State Board of Equalization"
Results 181 - 200
of 593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2010, 7:25 am
In his opinion in a more recent case involving the alleged educational benefits of diversity, Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 6:52 am
Respect for transgender peopleThe Supreme Court decided not to take up the school district’s appeal in Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 8:20 am
Recently, the Supreme Court decided to hear Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:51 pm
In other decisions from the same era, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment itself (section one) meant that states could not limit bond elections to property holders or school board elections to parents (and property holders). [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 10:43 am
In Clemas v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
SCHOOL BOARD OF ALACHUA COUNTY, Appellee. 1st District.Gear Shift: LOUISIANA APPEALS COURT AFFIRMS $5 MILLION VERDICT IN CHILD-DEATH CASE, Guillot v. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 2:03 pm
Did Henderson limit his activities to message board posting? [read post]
20 May 2012, 6:16 am
Lewow v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:11 am
(Note: the Court granted certiorari to resolve this question in Board of Education of New York v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
That balance is remarkably reflected in the August 16, 2017 decision in Weisberger v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
That balance is remarkably reflected in the August 16, 2017 decision in Weisberger v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 6:42 am
McMillen v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 2:09 pm
Vance v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am
Virginia State Board of Elections and McCrory v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
In Parents Involved, which the Court decided with its companion case, McFarland v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:23 pm
Board of Education was rightly decided, but Bolling v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
In Davenport v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 12:27 pm
" The case is Boseman v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:21 am
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Gail Markels and George Rose contend that California’s law restricting the sale of such games to minors is, at a practical level, unnecessary because it “empower[s] state bureaucrats to do what parents and retailers are already doing at no cost to taxpayers. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am
United States, 19-6113, and Bazan v. [read post]
