Search for: "Party 1 v. Party 2" Results 181 - 200 of 37,761
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2015, 12:15 pm by Daniel Nazer
These steps are: 1) identifying a “prospective third-party payer”; 2) detecting a “campaign triggering event” (this can be something like an inmate being booked into a facility); and 3) “initiating a campaign to proactively contact” the prospective third-party payer using an “interactive voice response system. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:20 pm by PaulKostro
Instead, a plaintiff must show “both (1) a fear of severe harm, and (2) that the fear of severe harm is reasonable. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 4:15 am
In countering Viacom’s $1 billion suit against YouTube, Google relies on the “safe harbor” provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) to shield it from liability for third party copyright infringements. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 8:38 am
On appeal, the defendant...claims that the court improperly (1) construed an agreement between the parties and (2) granted summary judgment as to his liability because there was a genuine issue of material fact with regard to the parties' agreement. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:33 am by Chip Merlin
The title of an article in the Michigan Bar Journal, Michigan Recognizes Claims For Bad-Faith Insurance Practices But The Burden is High and There Are Many Limitations,2 seems to imply that Michigan recognizes first-party bad faith cases. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 11:49 am
  The court amended Michigan Rule of Evidence 611 to state: “[t]he court shall exercise reasonable control over the appearance of parties and witnesses so as to (1) ensure that the demeanor of such persons may be observed and assessed by the fact-finder, and (2) to ensure the accurate identification of such persons. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:46 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- The Federal Circuit recently granted a panel rehearing and vacated a panel decision between these parties decided earlier this year (see Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am by Woodrow Pollack
 Plaintiff objected, arguing that: (1) Defendants weren't "prevailing parties;" and (2) Defendants hadn't filed the depositions in the Court record, and thus they were not recoverable. [read post]