Search for: "Party X v. Party Y"
Results 181 - 200
of 462
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2018, 2:52 am
’ United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:02 am
But consistent with the existent regime for other crimes, the law creates a standard of strict liability: legal persons are liable for the aforementioned crimes committed, directly or indirectly, with their intervention or in their name, interest or benefit (Article 2).This approach is consistent with the standard of corporate liability already in force for other crimes, such as custom’s crimes, tax crimes, money laundering, insider trading, and securities fraud, among others.The… [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am
Bibi decided that if X adopts the identity of Y, another real person, and X acquires the characteristics needed to obtain citizenship by using the identity of Y, the purported grant of citizenship to X as Y is a nullity. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
X. v Mr. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 3:48 pm
And indeed falsely suggesting that X committed a serious crime that was really committed by Y can be defamation (especially once the speaker is on notice of the error). [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:09 am
“You infringe patent x with product y”) will have to wait for a longer time than a Claimant who gives more detailed information (e.g. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
As illustrated most recently in the Access Copyright v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 9:55 am
Roberts Jr. was particularly dismissive of what he called — rather oddly — “sociological gobbledygook” in the challengers’ arguments: [If] you’re the intelligent man on the street and the Court issues a decision, and let’s say the Democrats win, and that person will say: Well, why did the Democrats win And the answer is going to be because EG was greater than 7 percent, where EG is the sigma of party X wasted votes minus the sigma of… [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 12:03 pm
Plaintiff says X, Defendant says Y. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 2:51 pm
" And the answer is going to be because EG was greater than 7 percent, where EG is the sigma of party X wasted votes minus the sigma of party Y wasted votes over the sigma of party X votes plus party Y votes. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
App'x 465, 464 (5th Cir. 2004), we recognized that when "waiver . . . depends on the conduct of the parties before the district court," "the court, not the arbitrator, is in the best position to decide whether the conduct amounts to a waiver under applicable law. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 2:29 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of X v Y and Z [2017] NSWSC 1214 Pembroke J extended orders against foreign defendants to restrain the publication of confidential information on various platforms and websites. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
Examples include diagnostic ultrasound products, x-ray machines and medical lasers. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
JESSICA PARKER VALENTINE AND BRYAN L. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:09 pm
In other words, in a string of transactions from X to Y to Z, if X to Y is non-usurious, but Y to Z is usurious, can X shelter in Y's usury defense? [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
Doc. 65, Mot. for Att'y Fees 1; Doc 66-1, Cronenwett Decl. [read post]
25 May 2017, 9:06 am
Agency v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am
Ed. [read post]
4 May 2017, 5:45 pm
That is, instead of asking, in the manner of many law school classrooms, does Congress have the abstract power to pass X or Y? [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:25 am
The bench was relatively quiet for yesterday morning’s argument in Henson v. [read post]
