Search for: "Patty v State" Results 181 - 200 of 303
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2015, 10:00 pm by Giorgio Buono
Fabrizio Vismara, Associate Professor at the University of Insubria, discusses agreements as to successions and family pacts in “Patti successori nel regolamento (UE) n. 650/2012 e patti di famiglia: un’interferenza possibile? [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
And only once did I imagine the parties in a case and give them faces – State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:38 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
  Thanks to Patty Salkin's Law of the Land for bringing this case to our attention. ----------------------------------------------------------------------* For more recent invocations of the phrase, see See Kennedy v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:13 pm by David Lat
In the lawsuit brought by Steptoe & Johnson against Rogue States Burgers, in an effort to stop Rogue States’ rogue smells from infiltrating law firm airspace, Big Law has triumped over big beef patties. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:04 am by SHG
Radley Balko interviewed Joseph Cassilly, Harford County, Maryland state’s attorney, for his article at Reason about the handful of states that contend that it's a crime to record police in the performance of their duty. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:01 am by Eric Turkewitz
So here’s what a few others have written: Scott Greenfield: Not Perfect (Blawg Review) Scott Greenfield–a New York Criminal Defense Lawyer of Note (Sui Generis) Scott Greenfield – who really should be in the top 5 (Gamso for the Defense) Scott Greenfield and the On-Line Community (Norm Pattis) Scott Greenfield Can Dish It Out (People v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court found that Regulation 3 does not carry the force of law (see Weiss v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:12 pm by Christopher Schmidt
”  State enforced segregation was wrong, but so was state enforced integration in certain spheres of private relations. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 3:41 am
State (pdf) upheld the trial court's reasonable doubt definition, which was, according to the trial court, "a slight variation of the charge on reasonable dobut recommended by Justice Ginsburg . . . in Victor v. [read post]