Search for: "People in Interest of LJ"
Results 181 - 200
of 339
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am
There was no history of people slipping on the steps. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:24 am
One of the hallmarks of totalitarian regimes is their insistence on controlling people’s thoughts as well as their behaviour. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:30 pm
Let Leveson LJ then factor that in to his considerations, in order to stress test any new model. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
In particular, it can impose a specific behaviors to one of the private parties of the deal, or require a legislative intervention in order to accommodate the interest of private parties. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:48 pm
People don’t understand counterintuitive rules, and the rules without an exemption are counterintuitive. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:37 am
The role of the “Jurats” is interesting more generally. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:16 pm
The locals people wanted a public inquiry. [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:17 pm
While thirteen people were arrested for a range of offences, the police believed that another 15 or 20 participated in the violence but had not been identified. [read post]
19 May 2012, 1:36 pm
Third, Maurice Kay LJ made some interesting comments about the effect of the UN Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
On 8 May 2012 the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls and Laws LJ) gave permission to appeal in the case of Coulson v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:09 pm
Full Fact, The Media Standards Trust, Index on Censorship and English PEN made the application on Tuesday, urging Leveson LJ to publish the names of any senior civil servants who will be able to see this material, to make sure the process remains transparent. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:19 am
Finally, Beatson J emphasised that “freedom of expression includes the right to say things which “right thinking people” consider dangerous or irresponsible or which shock or disturb” [55], citing numerous authorities in support. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am
OF COURSE it’s moderated – you people are not responsible for any legal actions, the paper is… think before you ink“. [read post]
7 May 2012, 1:47 am
It isn’t just friendly, inoffensive speech that is protected: Sedley LJ’s statement (in Redmond-Bates v DPP (1999) 163 JP 789 that “freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having” was cited amongst others to this effect. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm
Isabel McArdle posted on the report for UKHRB, but if more detail is required, the report itself (or at least, particular sections of interest) is recommended. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am
In a press statement, RMT claims it “falsely portrays our General Secretary Bob Crow as being part of a culture of political immorality and as having caused serious harm to the interests of people in London“. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
The Samaritans said “it was felt the column’s use of imagery and tone violated the dignity of people who had died by suicide and intruded into the grief of their families“. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 7:27 am
Toulson LJ said that this was irrelevant. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 5:57 pm
In a democracy, where power depends on the consent of the people governed, the answer must lie in the transparency of the legal process. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 2:11 am
He added: “I’d give him my views, and if he found them interesting or if he found them useful then I was glad. [read post]
