Search for: "People v Bright" Results 181 - 200 of 1,180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2021, 12:37 pm by Jack Kiley and Lindsay Colvin Stone
The legal landscape continues to evolve quickly and there is a lack of clear-cut authority or bright line rules on implementation. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  One of the most extensive modern political-question discussions by the Supreme Court came in the 1993 Supreme Court ruling of Nixon v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 1:17 pm
  Now, that's not a bright-line rule, and there are other opinions that hold that interrogations remain custodial (and thus require Miranda warnings) even when officers said the exact same thing. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Secondly, discrimination may arise where people who enjoy a relevant status are treated differently from people not sharing that status who are in a similar situation. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 3:39 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The European Court has not adopted any bright line rule that the solitary confinement of a person under 18 is automatically a violation of article 3 of the ECHR. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 2:02 pm
  The Supreme Court, for example, has plenty of incredibly bright justices, and often renders well-crafted opinions with which I agree. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 6:36 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The test originated in the foundational case of Bardal v Globe and Mail Ltd., a 1960 Ontario decision. [read post]