Search for: "People v Childs"
Results 181 - 200
of 7,016
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2008, 1:16 pm
I think that you can figure out how this case comes out based solely upon two facts:(1) the fact that it's in front of the California Supreme Court; and(2) the fact that the first sentence of the opinion begins: "Defendant Alphonso Howard was sentenced to death after a jury convicted him of first degree murder, rape, and a forcible lewd act upon a child under the age of 14. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 4:59 pm
That was the issue in People v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:30 am
Shepherd v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 1:55 pm
To identify people accessing Pedoboard, the FBI installed Network InvestigativeTechnique (`NIT’) software on the website, which revealed the true IP addresses of people accessing the site, the date and time the user accessed the content, and the user's computer operating system.U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 3:07 pm
Here are some of the presumptively invalid reasons under CCP 231.7(e): (1) Expressing a distrust of or having a negative experience with law enforcement or the criminal legal system.(2) Expressing a belief that law enforcement officers engage in racial profiling or that criminal laws have been enforced in a discriminatory manner.(3) Having a close relationship with people who have been stopped, arrested, or convicted of a crime.(4) A prospective juror's neighborhood.(5)… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:01 am
U.S. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 3:16 pm
Think jail time.*** I seriously think Wisconsin v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 1:32 pm
A jury convicted defendant of nine counts of aggravated sexual assault on a child. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:28 am
In Koon v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:56 am
Gavia v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:39 am
While the Guidelines are no longer mandatory and federal judges have far more sentencing discretion since the United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 4:14 pm
People v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 6:04 am
Peggie Smith, Welfare, Child Care, and the People Who Care: Union Representation of Family Child Care Providers (52). [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:32 am
Peggie Smith, Welfare, Child Care, and the People Who Care: Union Representation of Family Child Care Providers (49). [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 5:31 am
Peggie Smith, Welfare, Child Care, and the People Who Care: Union Representation of Family Child Care Providers (50). [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 11:07 am
In July 2012, the Michigan Supreme Court decided People v Likine and ruled that impossibility of payment of child support is a defense to a charge of felony non-support. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:32 am
Peggie Smith, Welfare, Child Care, and the People Who Care: Union Representation of Family Child Care Providers (49). [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 8:16 am
Peggie Smith, Welfare, Child Care, and the People Who Care: Union Representation of Family Child Care Providers (44). [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 5:31 am
Peggie Smith, Welfare, Child Care, and the People Who Care: Union Representation of Family Child Care Providers (50). [read post]
