Search for: "People v Christopher" Results 181 - 200 of 1,199
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
Yesterday the University at Buffalo Law School held the panel discussion “Sex, Solicitation, and the Supreme Court: Remembering People v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 4:09 pm by Earl Drott
Recently, a Texas court set forth an opinion in Press Energy Services, LLC and Christopher James Nissley v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Sam Cohen, Alex Vivona
These requirements, according to the Chinese maritime safety authorities, apply to “1. submersibles; 2. nuclear vessels; 3. ships carrying radioactive materials; 4. ships carrying bulk oil, chemicals, liquefied gas and other toxic and harmful substances; [and] 5. other vessels that may endanger the maritime traffic safety of the [People’s Republic of] China. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 7:20 am by Susan Landau
It is as if the Supreme Court had ruled in Katz v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 5:13 am by H. Michael Steinberg
Michael Steinberg Colorado Criminal Defense Lawyer Introduction – A Massive ChangeTo Plea Bargains in the Colorado Criminal Justice System Quietly, with little fanfare, the Colorado Supreme Court, in the case of People of the State of Colorado, v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
You can also read the article PDF; I still have time to make edits, and I'd love to hear what corrections or suggestions or counterarguments people have. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Italy Italy’s public broadcaster Rai has come under fire for broadcasting leaked CCTV footage of a fatal cable car crash that killed 14 people near Stresa, in the north of Italy. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 3:06 am
In re Joel Embiid, 2021 USPQ2d 577 (TTAB 2021) [precedential[ (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin). [read post]
21 May 2021, 7:31 am by Eugene Volokh
Conceal Carry, held Administrative Trademark Judge Christopher Larkin of the Trademark Trial & Appeal Board, joined by Judges Linda Kuczma and Thomas Shaw (Coca-Cola Co. v. [read post]