Search for: "People v Colin" Results 181 - 200 of 237
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2010, 11:01 pm by Mark Bennett
At Balkinization, guest blogger Sharon Dolovich explains why the Supreme Court’s Farmer v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:45 am by David Keane
This marked a major elevation in terms of their legal effect in India, in part influenced by the 1951 Indian Supreme Court decision in Madras v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:07 am
The Oyster Case: Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:13 pm by charonqc
The restriction confirmed by the courts in Whaley v Lord Watson 2000 (later confirmed by the House of lords). [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
In Manock v Channel Seven Adelaide Pty Ltd [2010] SASC 198 Channel was refused leave to plead an entirely new defence of justification in a libel claim brought by  forensic pathologist Dr Colin Manock. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm by WIMS
The company also has paid approximately $42 million in compensation to people and companies affected by the spill. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:21 am by Adam Wagner
The issue is not clear cut, as there is a strong argument that whilst the right to peaceful protest is crucial to a functioning democracy, this does not mean that people can protest wherever and whenever they like. [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:18 am
If there is an IP licence, a liquidator might describe it as an onerous licence and disclaim it [says the IPKat, on a recent dispute involving this area, see Butters v BBC here]. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 12:35 am
You can read it for yourself here.The IPKat's friend Colin Birss QC has drawn his attention to a landmark ruling in an American case about patenting genes: AMP v USPTO 09 Civ 4515 (DJ Sweet). [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
As she puts it in her bio, "I care very much about information technology and how it affects people's lives, but I'm concerned that legal policies and precedents are being very foolishly decided that are ultimately detrimental to society. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
As she puts it in her bio, "I care very much about information technology and how it affects people's lives, but I'm concerned that legal policies and precedents are being very foolishly decided that are ultimately detrimental to society. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 4:25 pm by Lisa Kennelly
The New York Times story today on the glaring obviousness of many people's passwords (seriously, 123456?) [read post]