Search for: "People v Goldstein" Results 181 - 200 of 479
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2017, 9:01 am by Ronald Mann
… [Y]ou have repose under his theory, in the sense that you know what people are suing you about. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:45 am by SHG
When Gerry Goldstein, a celebrated criminal defense lawyer in San Antonio, heard I was moving to Albany, he said I had to meet Terence Kindlon and Laurie Shanks. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Stoumbos and Visa, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 7:24 am by Stephen Wermiel
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioners in Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 2:04 pm by Sandy Levinson
 With respect, try telling that first to Eugene V. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among counsel to the petitioner in MCM. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Abishek Nagaraj: Good job of studying IP free zones v. struggles. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Flat fee v. pay per performance v. tournament—if you do very well, big payment, but otherwise nothing. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 3:22 pm by Amy Howe
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in State Farm. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 3:58 am by SHG
One of the least understood, and most important, reasons why cops kill with seeming impunity is that people can’t seem to wrap their heads around the legal standard established by Graham v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am by John Elwood
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am by John Elwood
” That’s a lot of disagreement for people who agree on the disposition of a case. [read post]